Memory 101

Memory 101

u9 24 Sep 2007 18:10

Here's my first memory game. I'm kinda thinking it would be much better using objects. The cards would fit nicely as objects with properties such as x and y position, turned up or down, image, etc. so i'm beginning to thing that memory is not so suitable as a second game, or if it is, it should introduce the concept of objects/user-defined types.

Here's a windows executable with the cut out graphics and the source code.

http://file-pasta.com/f/2048.zip

Please let me know what you guys think.

Last edited on 24 Sep 2007 18:11 by u9 Show more

Re: Memory 101

Anonymous (82.36.235.x) 24 Sep 2007 23:20

Excellent Game, I was thinking about making something similar but never got around to it, lol. :D

It took me 33 turns on my first go. ;)

…matthew, can't login lol.

Re: Memory 101

u9 25 Sep 2007 13:37

Cool… My best was 19, but that was an amazingly lucky game. All cards were almost after each other :) Usually i need ~26-28 turns. But i find it really difficult to memorize the cards. They all seem so similar and distinguishable in my head.

Thanks for trying it matt :)

Btw, i think there is something seriously wrong with wikidot's login system. It seems like i'm the only one who hasn't had trouble logging in (yet)…

Re: Memory 101

webfaction 27 Oct 2007 19:02

U9,
Great job, Its kind of addicting. I won't say how many turns it took but lets just say it took me a while to beat it lol. I think i'm going to try something like that.

Memory 102

u9 25 Sep 2007 14:33

Here's a bit object oriented version of the game. Game play is exactly the same, but i think the code is a bit nicer. Source and exe included.

http://www.mediafire.com/?8inxdjdzqjt

Re: Memory 102

Anonymous (82.36.235.x) 25 Sep 2007 18:13

Nice update, it took me 36 turns this time. :D

…matthew, still can't login. :)

Re: Memory 102

hartnell 25 Sep 2007 20:00

I finally got a chance to try this. The memory sprites looked better than I thought they would. It's very cool seeing my sprites in use. I think we're on to something with this research. —hartnell